A Mumbai court, while hearing a rape case, has held that the presence of a condom does not mean that the sex was consensual. The court was hearing a bail plea of ​​a Navy employee who has been accused of raping his colleague.

During the hearing, the court observed, “Merely because the condom is present at the scene of the incident is not sufficient to say that the complainant had consensual relationship with the applicant. It may also be that the accused used condoms to avoid further troubles.”

A Mumbai court, while hearing a rape case, has held that the presence of a condom does not mean that the sex was consensual. The court was hearing a bail plea of ​​a Navy employee who has been accused of raping his colleague.

During the hearing, the court observed, “Merely because the condom is present at the scene of the incident is not sufficient to say that the complainant had consensual relationship with the applicant. It may also be that the accused used condoms to avoid further troubles.”