Added on : 2019-02-25 15:00:05
The Supreme Court is going to hear the Ram Janmabhoomi case on Tuesday. Before that, BJP MP Subramanian Swamy has made tremendous arguments in the court. He presented his plea before the court and said that he has the fundamental right to pray at Ayodhya's Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid site. They urged their demand to be listed immediately. After which the Chief Justice replied that on Ayodhya trial on Tuesday, he will be present in the court premises.
On the basis of his logic, Swamy appealed for separate hearing in the Supreme Court in this matter. But Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said, "Come tomorrow (Tuesday) to the court, we will see it." Earlier in December 2018, Subramanian Swamy had said in a religious program that prayers can be read anywhere, so Muslims should leave the claim at the disputed site in Ayodhya.
Swamy said that the Archaeological Survey has confirmed the temple, hence the Muslim community should now release the claim on this land so that the Ram temple can be constructed. He also had to say that in 1994, the central government had told the Supreme Court that if the temple is found below, then it should be done according to the wishes of the Hindus. Swamy recalled that in 1994, during the government of PV Narasimha Rao, I had got Cabinet status as well. Then the Supreme Court asked about the solution from the government (Ayodhya dispute) solution. In the Supreme Court, a total of 14 appeals have been filed in the case relating to the 2.77-acre land dispute in Ayodhya. All these appeals have been filed in the Supreme Court against the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court on September 30, 2010.
In 2010, Allahabad High Court had ordered the distribution of the disputed land equally between Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lala Virajman. The Supreme Court had ordered stay in May 2011 on this matter.